Mike’s Points

Why Mike’s Points? I’m providing “points,” comments & links about PR, journalism, social media, branding, marketing & other items of interest.

February 10th, 2007

Getting ’social’ in public relations

(UPDATED Feb. 11, approx. 9:15 a.m. with examples below, marked **. These examples either involved me, or my current employer.)

More and more I’m convinced that public relations should be categorized as a social science in colleges, universities and in the professional world. Not in “Communications.” Not part of the journalism or English curricula. (I’m also convinced that journalism is more of a trade than a profession that requires a degree. Ask, and I’ll explain why.)

At its roots, public relations — and, I suppose, advertising and other marketing communications — is about communicating to people. (Very similar to one of my two college majors, economics.) Social media like blogs, online communities, boards, etc., is a couple steps closer to a true social science than traditional marcomm activities.

While I’m still a firm believer that corporations have the most significant control over their brand, you can employ a bit of social science thinking to work with others (not use others) to try to communicate your brand to others.

Unfortunately, many in our professional don’t have faith in their fellow mankind or don’t know how to work with others to accomplish their social media efforts. And, they resort to fake blogs* or use services like PayPerPost (legit, but definitely not as credible as true, objective, third-party blog posts).

They’re afraid to lose control of the message. But, in traditional media relations, we do that all the time in working with the media. There’s definitely value in having a reporter publish a story about your company, but there’s also a level of risk.

So, why should working with Joe/Jane Blogger be any different?

Here are a couple ways to successfully engage bloggers about your company, product, service, etc. 

Enlist bloggers to review your product. People who blog are naturally opinionated — why else start a blog if you don’t want a soap box or have a cause. So, ask them to give you feedback. Don’t ask them to blog about it. Let them know that if they do blog about your product, you’ll offer their readers a discount or other something special. But, be sure they know that you do value their credibility and objectivity. So, even if you don’t get publicity (i.e., a post), you’ll still get objective product feedback. That’s always valuable. And, if you do get blog posts out of it — afterall, these are opinionated people you’re dealing with — then you’ve achieved two positive results.

Remember: Be careful on the perceived value of anything you send bloggers. Their credibility is important. You don’t want to be seen as buying their positive feedback. If you’re in doubt about the perceived value of a product, make sure bloggers know that what you send them is a loan (and you will pay for them to send it back). If the product price is low, say $15, that’s likely nothing that will be perceived as undue influence if they keep it. (For an example, here.**)

Offer bloggers an opportunity they normally may not have. Offer them access to your company, to beta test a product, or to attend a special event. And, then let them blog about the opportunity as they want. You want their credible, unbiased opinion — you don’t want a paid hack. Better to err on the side of less than more in terms of any type of compensation or expectations from you. (For an example, see here.** Note that expenses were paid, not time paid.)

Our job entails determing the how in communicating a message as much as what that message is. Get to know your audience and those who reach your audience, and figure out how best to reach them.

– Mike

*Note that the link takes you to a Google News search without “Edelman.”

December 13th, 2006

Chicago’s WBEZ trying ‘citizen radio’?

One of Chicago’s three public radio stations — WBEZ — will be changing its format come next April and offer a “user-generated content” format. (Tip-o-the-hat to JR at ToledoTalk.com.)

According to (not-so-secret) SecretRadioProject.com:

SecretRadioProject-trailer“It’s a creative free-for-all, with no shows and no stuffy time slots. . . .

Every time you tune in, you’ll hear something new and surprising - music, interviews, shout outs, essays and more. All with a local bent and an unmistakably Chicago voice.

And the best part: this radio comes from you. You’re the creator, deejay, producer and editor.

Give us your take on what’s happening in your neighborhood. Share your deepest thoughts, confessions and opinions about your world. Upload audio to our website and tune in as we play it for all of Chicago and the world to hear.”

There’s also a forum to discuss the project. And, NU student Matt Weir has a good story about it at his NewsAssignment.net blog. From Weir’s post:

“[I]t takes the infrastructure of cyber-community involvement — Secret Radio Project relies on YouTube uploading and a blog-esque style — and adapts it to a radio station serving a geographic community.”

I’m scratching my head a bit over this one. Maybe it’ll work out with some sort of semi-regular programming — ensuring the major airing hours are filled.

With outlets like radio, don’t we tune in based on the host and his/her show? We know what to expect.

While I’d be tempted to listen to WBEZ after the new format launches, if I’m not satisfied with the first few shows I hear, I doubt if I’d be back.

I’ll definitely reserve final judgment (assuming I’ll be able to pick it up on the ‘net), but it sounds like the new WBEZ be similar to the amateurish sounds and musings I heard on my college’s student-run radio station.

That is until PR and marketing people get wind of it. (Then, it’ll be one long commercial. ;) )

– Mike