Mike’s Points

Based in Toledo, Ohio/SE Michigan since summer 2005, my goal is to provide “points,” comments & links about PR, journalism, social media, branding, marketing & other items of interest. Maintained by Mike Driehorst, president & founder of Diamond Communications, specializing in PR & social media.

January 28th, 2007

What is this cup?

The past week or so has been positively stressful. That is, stressful, but in very positive ways. Waterproofing contractors in to ensure our basement gets and stays dry — so far, very pleased EverDry! — plus a piece of professionally exciting news. I’ll save that for another possible post.

In the meantime, how’s your movie knowledge?

Henry Jones cup 1939 fullviewMy wife found this cup (see left and below) and, after some ‘net research, the only conclusion is that it is a prop from one of the Indiana Jones movies

A friend pointed me to this movie prop replica site, but I didn’t find any specific matches (though I think the cup could be Holy Grail?).Henry Jones Cup 1939 closeup

So, for you movie or antique and collectible buffs, do you know what this is? (For an enlargement of the close up, see here. For a close up of the full view image, see here.)

Any and all help would be appreciated. Just leave a comment with any answers or good guesses.

– Mike

January 19th, 2007

Who do you trust? Credibility in the blogosphere

It’s interesting how people independent of each other are part of a collective discussion on a certain topic. Today, I’ve seen a few posts and comments that deal with the influence of bloggers. Influence dealing with ads and companies like PayPerPost or SponsoredReviews, and biases a blogger may have.

First, here’s the round up:

Colin McKay/CanuckFlack in a comment

On Blogs, Advertising and a Crass Capitalist World (and at ToledoTalk.com)

SponsoredReviews: A New Assault on the Blogosphere’s Credibility (courtesy of Matt Sussman/FutonReport.net)

Since it’s more human nature to complain than it is to praise, I think people who blog have a negative reputation; more so from those who are not familiar with blogging.

Yeah, it may not be fair, but life’s not fair.

But, we all can do something about it. It is encumbent upon those who blog to be:

  • Transparent: If you have a close association with or are being paid to post about a product, service, company, etc., let your readers know. It won’t hurt your credibility. It will, though, if you hide it and get caught.
  • Honest: This is similar to being transparent. Be forthright and upfront. Don’t make up information to support your cause. The means rarely justify the end.
  • Open to opposing opinions: You’re not always right. (I know I’m not.) Listening to others’ opinions doesn’t mean you’ll change your opinion. Be humble and have a thick skin.
  • Thorough: Similar to being honest, if you are going to play citizen journalist, be an irate or happy customer, or call someone out, be sure you have your facts right. You don’t have to go to the ends of the earth, but be reasonably thorough. And, when you’re not thorough and make a mistake, fess up.

Blogging is still in its infancy. If it is to become more widespread, open for the general public to join and participate, and generally accepted, we must have credibility.

– Mike

January 17th, 2007

The good and the bad of blogging

(UPDATED 1/19/2007 approx. 9 a.m.: Some quick reading and the lack of reading of comments on Paul McEnany’s post means I rushed to judgement below. I’ve since I apologized, left a main point, and one final one about how we at times treat others behind our keyboard.)

Original post:

The ease and quickness offered by self-publishing (that is, blogging) has been both a boom and the bane of existence for corporations.

There are plenty examples of corporations successfully reaching out to and working with bloggers.

Then, there are times when companies just hate the power that some bloggers seem to have. And, like most things, that power can be used for bad or good.

Let’s look at what I’d call the bad use of blogger power.

Paul McEnany/Hee-Haw Marketing made a trip to Dallas Kohl’s store around Christmas and found much of the store in disarray. And, from those photos, that store did look pretty bad – at that moment.

But, for all we know, that may have been an extremely busy day, and atypical for that Kohl’s or any Kohl’s store. So, did McEnany go back later to see if the mess was a one-day deal or a pattern?

It doesn’t look like it to me.

And, while he may have received some great traffic, Kohl’s got a bit of a black eye. All because of McEnany’s jumping to conclusions.

If you are going to blog, no matter what letter you are, you have a responsibility for fairness and accuracy. It’s your personal integrity on the line. Now, I’ve jumped to a false conclusion in the past — and I apologized for it. But, that was a one-time deal.

Has McEnany learned anything — even after being contacted by Kohl’s? (Granted, Kohl’s response was pretty routine and didn’t do any good.)

Let’s jump to San Francisco and KSFO’s run-in with a blogger called Spocko.

Spocko didn’t like what some of KSFO-AM’s local talk show hosts were saying on air. So, he used the power of blogging to post some clips on his blog, contacted advertisers and encouraged them to stop advertising on KSFO.

From what I read, the “extreme comments” made by the hosts were not a one-time thing. So, Spocko voiced concerns and objections. He not only wrote letters, but he used his blog to post proof.

He seems to have a legit argument. The radio show host’s comments are not one-time events — like it seems the Kohl’s incident was. (Or, at least, McEnany hasn’t shown any proof that the sloppy stores are a pattern.)

Blogging in and of itself is neither good nor bad. It’s the level of self-responsibility and the integrity of the blogger that makes it so.

And, corporations are just going to have to deal with it.

But, that’s another post topic.

– Mike

January 15th, 2007

PayPerPost leading transparency charge?

A few weeks ago, PayPerPost initiated a policy requiring its bloggers to disclose they’re being paid for reviews.

Now, PPP has launched DisclosurePolicy.org. (Thanks to HistoryMike for the pointer.)

DisclosurePolicy.org was created and funded by PayPerPost. Anyone interested in collaborating on blogosphere transparency is encouraged to contact us.

Even if it isn’t new, it’s a great corporate PR move. Heck, just a great move in general.

Because it’s the right thing to do.

If PPP (just love typing that ;) ) is to have any credibility for advertisers, blog readers and others in promotion/marketing, it does need a reputation of transparency.

So, does this make you think any differently of PPP?

It does for me.

Mike

January 12th, 2007

Other great points . . . .

For your reading, thinking, surfing and chuckling pleasure, I offer:

Kodak enjoys the digital moment, BlogWorks. (UPDATED after the initial post, after a bit more of blog browsing. Count this among the chuckling links!)

Wells Fargo At The Paris Hilton, Wells Fargo/Guided By History

I’m not saying anything, but . . . ., Colin McKay/Canuckflack

How to Successfully Promote Your Company in Second Life, Kami Huyse/Communications Overtones

Someone else joins the bloggers-with-cancer club, Bob LeDrew/FlackLife.

Honor Among Publicists: Resolutions for 2007, Todd Defren/PR Squared

Do Cookies Destroy Rainforests?, Marc Gunther